A Study on Characteristic Changes and Causes of Pond Landscape Systems in the Process of Urbanization

doi:10.13209/j.0479-8023.2017.060

Abstract

Abstract:

The study analyzes changes in landscape characteristics of ponds in the Liangjiang New Area. The spatial and temporal changes of ponds were present by quantitative characteristics and spatial distribution characteristics using remote sensing images of 2000 and 2012. Landscape metrics of amount, surface area and density of ponds were calculated to analyze quantitative characteristic changes of ponds associated with increased urbanization. Landscape indices of fragmentation, resolution and connectedness were utilized to describe changes in spatial networks of ponds based on GIS, as well as the relationships between urbanization and them. PLANDS of buffer area around ponds were calculated to analyze changes of lands around ponds, which combined paddy, upland, grassland, woodland, water area and construction area. The results show that the number of ponds was significantly reduced from 1906 to 270 with a reduction rate of 85.8%, and the water surface area decreased from 175.9 to 59.2 hectare with a reduction rate of 66.3% during the 12 years. Increased urbanization is the main reason of the persistent decrease of ponds, especially the effect of roads, squares and lands to be built. Ponds would have a bigger chance to exist if they have a long distance from built-up areas in space distribution. The surface area of ponds existed are between 0.1 to 1 hectare. However, most of the ponds existed had low utilization value except the complete ponds in the residential land with ecological value. The results offer some suggestions for modern sponge city construction.

Key words: ponds, sponge city, urbanization, landscape characteristic, land use, ecological value

摘要：

以重庆两江新区为研究区域, 以2000年和2012年的遥感影像为主要数据源, 运用地理信息系统和景观生态指标等研究方法, 通过陂塘的数量、面积、密度、破碎度、分离度和连接度等指标来研究陂塘景观的数量特征和空间分布特征的变化规律, 以及城镇化建设与陂塘景观变化之间的关系。通过水田、旱地、疏林草地、林地、水域和建设用地等指标来研究陂塘周边用地基质的变化规律。结果表明: 1) 在12年间陂塘显著削减, 数量由1906个削减为270个, 水面面积由175.9 hm²降至59.2 hm², 数量减少85.8%, 面积减少66.3%; 2) 快速扩张的城镇化建设是导致陂塘景观荒废和消失的主要原因, 其中影响最大的是道路广场用地和旱地(待建设用地); 3) 空间分布上远离建成区的陂塘斑块存活率较高, 且保留的陂塘水面面积主要为0.1~1 hm²; 4) 大部分保留的陂塘景观利用价值低, 居住用地中保留的陂塘是最完整的, 也是最具有后续生态利用价值的。研究结果可以为现代海绵城市规划建设提供依据。

关键词: 陂塘, 海绵城市, 城镇化, 景观特征, 土地利用, 生态价值

CLC Number:

TP984

Zhifang WANG, Ganglu ZHU. A Study on Characteristic Changes and Causes of Pond Landscape Systems in the Process of Urbanization[J]. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 2017, 53(4): 701-709.

王志芳, 朱刚露. 城镇化过程中陂塘景观系统的特征演变与成因分析[J]. 北京大学学报自然科学版, 2017, 53(4): 701-709.

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://xbna.pku.edu.cn/EN/10.13209/j.0479-8023.2017.060

https://xbna.pku.edu.cn/EN/Y2017/V53/I4/701

Figures/Tables 14

References 28

[1]	杭宏秋.陂塘兴废的正负效应及思考. 古今农业, 2001(4): 12-17
[2]	张芳. 中国古代灌溉工程技术史.太原: 山西教育出版社, 2009: 107-128, 462-480
[3]	肖克非.关于皖中左陵区防旱问题的意见. 安徽农业科学, 1980(2): 3-8
[4]	涂安国, 尹炜, 陈德强, 等. 多水塘系统调控农业非点源污染研究综述. 人民长江, 2009, 40(21): 71-73
[5]	孙璞. 农村水塘对地块氮磷流失的截留作用研究. 水资源保护, 1998(1): 1-4, 12
[6]	陶文星, 喻光明, 李智国, 等. 农村土地整理中的堰塘整理及其对生态环境的影响: 以湖北省武穴市魏高邑镇土地整理项目为例. 农业发展与环境, 2007, 24(4): 5-10
[7]	张妤琳, 刘晓南, 赵宇, 等. 快速城市化地区塘的消减过程研究: 以广州市天河区为例. 生态环境学报, 2014, 23(2): 244-251
[8]	戴芹芹, 王志芳. 重庆堰塘-冲冲田系统对现代水资源管理的启示. 中国水利, 2015(1): 34-37
[9]	Horton G A.Water words dictionary: a compilation of technical water, water quality, environmental, and water-related terms. Nevada: Nevada Division of Water Resources, 2000: 487
[10]	Biggs J, Walker D, Whitfield M, et al.Pond action: promoting the conservation of ponds in Britain. Freshwater Forum, 1991, 1(2): 114-118
[11]	Boothby J.Framing a strategy for pond landscape conservation: aims, objectives and issues. Landscape Research, 1999, 24(1): 67-83
[12]	Huang S L, Lee Y C, Budd W, et al.Analysis of changes in farm pond network connectivity in the peri-urban landscape of the Taoyuan Area, Taiwan. Environmental Management, 2012, 49(4): 915-928
[13]	Fang W T.A Landscape approach to reserving farm ponds for wintering bird refuges in Taoyuan, Taiwan [D]. Texas: Texas A&M University, 2005
[14]	Froneman A, Mangnall M J, Little R M, et al.Waterbird assemblages and associated habitat charac-teristics of farm ponds in the Western Cape, South Africa. Biodiversity & Conservation, 2001, 10(2): 251-270
[15]	Yin C, Shan B.Multipond systems: a sustainable way to control diffuse phosphorus pollution. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, 2001, 30(6): 369-375
[16]	俞孔坚, 姜芊孜, 王志芳, 等. 陂塘景观研究进展与评述. 地域研究与开发, 2015, 34(4): 1-2
[17]	Francl K E, Schnell G D.Relationships of human disturbance, bird communities, and plant communities along the land-water interface of a large reservoir. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2002, 73(1): 67-93
[18]	Chou W W, Lee S H, Wu C F.Evaluation of the preservation value and location of farm ponds in Yunlin County, Taiwan. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2013, 11(1): 548-572
[19]	Tischendorf L, Fahrig L.On the usage and mea-surement of landscape connectivity. Oikos, 2000, 90(1): 7-19
[20]	邵怀勇, 仙巍, 杨午年. 三峡水库建设前后10年库区景观空间格局动态变化研究: 以重庆开县为例. 测绘科学, 2008, 33(6): 175-178
[21]	Downing J A, Cole J J, Middelburg J J, et al.Sediment organic carbon burial in agriculturally eutrophic impoundments over the last century. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 2008, 22(1): 10-18
[22]	Wu J S, Holman R E, Dorney J R.Systematic evaluation of pollutant removal by urban wet deten-tion ponds. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 1996, 122(11): 983-988
[23]	Scheffer M, Geest G J Van,Zimmer K,et al.Small habitat size and isolation can promote species rich-ness: second-order effects on biodiversity in Shallow Lakes and Ponds. Oikos, 2006, 112(1): 227-231
[24]	吴昌广, 周志翔. 景观连接度的概念、度量及其应用. 生态学报, 2010, 30(7): 1903-1910
[25]	由畅, 周永斌, 于丽芬. 景观破碎化数量分析方法概述. 中国农学通报, 2006, 22(5): 146-151
[26]	重庆市统计局.重庆统计年鉴.北京: 中国统计出版社, 1999-2014
[27]	陈娴椒, 倪凤娣, 周维禄, 等. 重庆市耕地变化及驱动力分析. 西南农业大学学报, 2010, 8(4): 15-19
[28]	周于翔, 骆东奇, 莫良玉. 重庆市耕地利用动态变化及其驱动力研究. 国土资源科技管理, 2007, 24(6): 7-11

年份	数量	水面总面积/10⁴m²	平均水面面积/10⁴m²	最大面积/10⁴m²	最小面积/m²
2000	1906	175.9	0.1	7.7	0.2
2012	270	59.2	0.2	3.3	2.2

年份	数量	水面总面积/10⁴m²	平均水面面积/10⁴m²	最大面积/10⁴m²	最小面积/m²
2000	1906	175.9	0.1	7.7	0.2
2012	270	59.2	0.2	3.3	2.2

年份	密度/10^-6m^-2	破碎度/10^-4m^-2	分离度	结构连接度
年份	密度/10^-6m^-2	破碎度/10^-4m^-2	分离度	平均距离/m	平均最邻近距离/m
2000	16.4	10.8	10.3	5413.3	54.4
2012	2.3	4.6	53.5	5289.2	113.7

年份	密度/10^-6m^-2	破碎度/10^-4m^-2	分离度	结构连接度
年份	密度/10^-6m^-2	破碎度/10^-4m^-2	分离度	平均距离/m	平均最邻近距离/m
2000	16.4	10.8	10.3	5413.3	54.4
2012	2.3	4.6	53.5	5289.2	113.7

项目	用地类型	2012年用地面积/10⁴m²							2000年用地面积/10⁴m²	2000年面积比例%	用地中陂塘面积比例/%
项目	用地类型	水田	旱地	疏林草地	林地	水域	建成区	陂塘	2000年用地面积/10⁴m²	2000年面积比例%	用地中陂塘面积比例/%
2000年用地面积/(10⁴m²)	水田	331.5	219.5	202.0	115.3	8.5	659.3	15.00	1551	36.8	37.9
	旱地	10.3	160.3	66.8	56.8	3.0	218.3	1.0	516.5	12.2	9.3
	疏林草地	78.0	192.3	317.8	71.8	3.3	572.3	7.0	1242.25	29.4	27.6
	林地	33.5	65.8	29.3	195.5	5.8	138.5	4.0	472.3	11.2	9.6
	水域	6.0	8.5	7.3	5.3	28.00	49.5	4.3	108.8	2.6	11.5
	建成区	1.0	6.5	12.0	2.3	2.3	134.0	0.5	158.5	3.8	4.2
	陂塘	20.8	19.3	21.8	6.8	4.3	85.3	13.00	171	4.1	100
2012年用地面积/10⁴m²		481	672	656.8	453.5	55	1857	44.75
2012年面积比例/%		11.4	15.9	15.	10.8	1.3	44.0	1.1
用地中陂塘面积比例/%		15.7	32.5	12.2	15.7	11.9	12.0	100