Uplift-Exhumation History of Daqing Mountain, Inner Mongolia Since Late Mesozoic

doi:10.13209/j.0479-8023.2016.096

Abstract

Abstract:

Four bedrock samples, collected from the eastern segment of Daqing Mountain, were analyzed using apatite fission-track (AFT) method. This elucidates the uplift-exhumation history of this area since the Late Cretaceous — in particular, when the present geomorphology of Daqing Mountain was shaped. The AFT ages range from 57.7±3.8 Ma to 50.4±3.3 Ma and the track length is between 10.7±0.4 μm and 9.9±0.1 μm. Modeling of the fission track data suggests two stages of rapid uplift and cooling, 100-90 Ma and since 13.5-7 Ma. The second cooling stage (since 13.5-7 Ma) was characterized by the fast uplift-exhumation in this area, resulting in the present geomorphology of Daqing Mountain.

Key words: apatite fission track, uplift-exhumation, Middle-Late Miocene, Daqing Mountain

摘要：

对大青山东段 4 件基岩样品进行磷灰石裂变径迹研究, 获得该区晚中生代以来的隆升-剥露历史, 并探讨大青山现代地貌的形成。样品的磷灰石裂变径迹年龄为 57.7±3.8~50.4±3.3 Ma, 封闭径迹长度分布在10.7±0.4~9.9±0.1 μm之间。热历史模拟结果表明, 大青山地区存在晚白垩世(约 100~90 Ma)和中-晚中新世(13.5~7 Ma)以来两个快速抬升冷却阶段, 13.5~7 Ma 以来是本区剥露最快的时期, 这一阶段的隆升造就现今大青山的地貌格局。

关键词: 磷灰石裂变径迹, 隆升-剥露, 中-晚中新世, 大青山

CLC Number:

P542

Qinqin XU, Jianqing JI, Wentao ZHAO, Xiangjiang YU. Uplift-Exhumation History of Daqing Mountain, Inner Mongolia Since Late Mesozoic[J]. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 2017, 53(1): 57-65.

徐芹芹, 季建清, 赵文韬, 于祥江. 内蒙古大青山晚中生代以来的隆升‒剥露过程[J]. 北京大学学报自然科学版, 2017, 53(1): 57-65.

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://xbna.pku.edu.cn/EN/10.13209/j.0479-8023.2016.096

https://xbna.pku.edu.cn/EN/Y2017/V53/I1/57

Figures/Tables 5

References 63

[1]	李四光. 地质力学概论. 北京: 地质出版社, 1973
[2]	王建平, 杨玉东. 内蒙大青山地区的冲断和推覆构造. 中国地质科学院地质力学研究所所刊, 1983(4): 43-58
[3]	王建平, 杨玉东. 大青山及邻区冲断推覆构造形成机制的讨. // 构造地质论丛编辑部. 构造地质论丛(六). 北京: 地质出版社, 1986: 1-16
[4]	Zheng Y D, Davis G A, Wang C.Major thrust sheet in the Daqing Shan Mountains, Inner Mongolia, China. Science in China: Ser D, 1998, 41(5): 553-560
[5]	朱绅玉, 杨继贤. 阴山带燕山运动特征. 内蒙古地质, 1998(2): 29-38
[6]	Darby B J, Davis G A, Zheng Y D.Structural evolution of the southwestern Daqing Shan, Yinshan belt, Inner Mongolia, China // Hendrix M S, Davis G A. Paleozoic and mesozoic tectonic evolution of central asia: from continental assembly to intracon-tinental deformation. Boulder: Geological Society of America Memoir, 2001, 194: 199-214
[7]	葛肖虹. 华北板内造山带的形成史. 地质论评, 1989, 35(3): 254-261
[8]	Davis G A, Wang C, Zheng Y D, et al.The enigmatic Yinshan fold-and-thrust belt of northern China: new views on its intraplate contractional styles. Geology, 1998, 26(1): 43-46
[9]	Davis G A, Darby B J, Zheng Y D, et al.Geometric and temporal evolution of an extensional detachment fault, Hohhot metamorphic core complex, Inner Mongolia, China. Geology, 2002, 30(11): 1003-1006
[10]	刘正宏, 徐仲元, 杨振升. 论内蒙古大青山地区逆冲推覆构造. 中国区域地质, 1999, 18(4): 366-372
[11]	刘正宏, 徐仲元, 杨振升. 内蒙古大青山逆冲推覆构造带中泥质板岩激光微区40Ar/39Ar年龄. 中国地质, 2003, 30(3): 293-296
[12]	Ritts B D, Darby B J, Cope T.Early Jurassic extensional basin formation in the Daqing Shan segment of the Yinshan belt, northern North China Block, Inner Mongolia. Tectonophysics, 2001, 339: 239-258
[13]	徐仲元, 刘正宏, 杨振升. 内蒙古大青山地区中生代造山运动及构造演化. 长春科技大学学报, 2001, 31(4): 317-322
[14]	吴中海, 吴珍汉. 大青山晚白垩世以来的隆升历史. 地球学报, 2003, 24(3): 205-210
[15]	戚国伟, 张进江, 王新社, 等. 内蒙古大青山中生代逆冲-伸展构造格局及空间关系. 自然科学进展, 2007, 17(3): 329-338
[16]	杜菊民, 张庆龙, 徐士银, 等. 阴山晚中生代板内造山特征及其动力机制: 以内蒙古大青山为例. 地质学报, 2009, 83(7): 910-922
[17]	张进江, 戚国伟, 郭磊, 等. 内蒙古大青山逆冲推覆体系中生代逆冲构造活动的40Ar-39Ar定年. 岩石学报, 2009, 25(3): 609-620
[18]	Davis G A, Darby B J.Early Cretaceous overprinting of the Mesozoic Daqing Shan fold-and-thrust belt by the Hohhot metamorphic core complex, Inner Mongo-lia, China. Geoscience Frontiers, 2010, 1(1): 1-20
[19]	Guo L, Wang T, Castro A, et al.Petrogenesis and evolution of late Mesozoic granitic magmatism in the Hohhot metamorphic core complex, Daqing Shan, North China. International Geology Review, 2012, 54(16): 1885-1905
[20]	刘群. 内蒙古大青山山前断裂带构造变形特征. 世界地质, 2012, 31(1): 113-119
[21]	任纪舜, 牛宝贵, 王军, 等. 1:5000000 国际亚洲地质图. 北京: 地质出版社, 2013
[22]	内蒙古自治区地质矿产局. 内蒙古自治区区域地质志. 北京: 地质出版社, 1991
[23]	王兴安, 刘正宏, 王挽琼, 等. 内蒙古大青山逆冲推覆构造带中同构造方解石脉. 吉林大学学报: 地球科学版, 2012, 42(增刊3): 111-118
[24]	何峰, 杨丽. 乌拉山‒大青山地区区域地质及成矿特征. 西部资源, 2012, (6): 116-117
[25]	曹生儒, 郭喜珠, 吴之理, 等. 内蒙古自治区地. // 马丽芳. 中国地质图集. 北京: 地质出版社, 2002: 141-148
[26]	封书凯. 内蒙古白女羊盘地区白女羊盘组火山岩地层层序及时代. 内蒙古地质, 1998(4): 20-26
[27]	Laslett G M, Green P F, Duddy I R, et al.Thermal annealing of fission tracks in apatite 2. A quantitative analysis. Chemical Geology, 1987, 65(1): 1-13
[28]	康铁笙, 王世成. 地质热历史研究的裂变径迹法. 北京: 科学出版社, 1991
[29]	Fitzgerald P G, Sorkhabi R B, Redfield T F, et al.Uplift and denudation of the central Alaska Range: a case study in the use of apatite fission track thermo-chronology to determine absolute uplift parameters. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1995, 100(B10): 20175-20191
[30]	Johnson C.Resolving denudational histories in orogenic belts with apatite fission track thermo-chronology and structural data: an example from southern Spain. Geology, 1997, 25(7): 623-626
[31]	Ketcham R A, Donelick R A, Balestrieri M, et al.Reproducibility of apatite fission-track length data and thermal history reconstruction. Earth and Plane-tary Science Letters, 2009, 284: 504-515
[32]	Grimmer J C, Jonckheere R, Enkelmann E, et al.Cretaceous-Cenozoic history of the southern Tan-Lu fault zone: apatite fission-track and structural cons-traints from the Dabie Shan (eastern China). Tecto-nophysics, 2002, 359: 225-253
[33]	郭召杰, 张志诚, 廖国辉, 等. 天山东段隆升过程的裂变径迹年龄证据及构造意义. 新疆地质, 2002, 20(4): 331-334
[34]	王瑜, 万景林, 李齐, 等. 阿尔金山北段阿克塞-当今山口一带新生代山体抬升和剥蚀的裂变径迹证据. 地质学报, 2002, 76(2): 191-198
[35]	袁万明, 董金泉, 保增宽. 新疆阿尔泰造山带构造活动的磷灰石裂变径迹证据. 地学前缘, 2004, 11(4): 461-468
[36]	Enkelmann E, Ratschbacher L, Jonckheere R, et al.Cenozoic exhumation and deformation of northeastern Tibet and the Qinling: is Tibetan lower crustal flow diverging around the Sichuan Basin?. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 2006, 118(5/6): 651-671
[37]	Zheng D W, Zhang P Z, Wan J L, et al.Rapid exhumation at ~8 Ma on the Liupanshan thrust fault from apatite fission-track thermochronology: implica-tions for growth of the northeastern Tibetan Plateau margin. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2006, 248(122): 198-208
[38]	陈正乐, 李丽, 刘健, 等. 西天山隆升‒剥露过程初步研究. 岩石学报, 2008, 24(4): 625-636
[39]	孙东霞, 季建清, 张志诚, 等. 雅鲁藏布江中下游流域地貌差异演化的岩屑磷灰石裂变径迹证据. 科学通报, 2009, 54(23): 3738-3747
[40]	Dörr N, Lisker F, Clift P D, et al. Late Mesozoic-Cenozoic exhumation history of northern Svalbard and its regional significance: constraints from apatite fission track analysis. Tectonophysics, 2002, 514/517: 81-92
[41]	张志诚, 郭召杰, 李建锋, 等. 阿尔金断裂带中段中新生代隆升历史分析: 裂变径迹年龄制约. 第四纪研究, 2012, 32(3): 499-509
[42]	刘海青, 李荣西, 张艳妮, 等.磷灰石裂变径迹在确定造山带隆升速率中的应用. 西北地质, 2014, 47(2): 119-125
[43]	Yang W, Jolivet M, Dupont-Nivet G, et al.Mesozoic-Cenozoic tectonic evolution of southwestern Tian Shan: evidence from detrital zircon U/Pb and apatite fission track ages of the Ulugqat area, Northwest China. Gondwana Reserch, 2014, 26: 986-1008
[44]	Tang W H, Zhang Z C, Li J F, et al.Mesozoic and Cenozoic uplift and exhumation of the Bogda Moun-tain, NW China: evidence from apatite fission track analysis. Geoscience Frontiers, 2015, 6(4): 617-625
[45]	徐芹芹, 季建清, 孙东霞, 等. 新疆阿尔泰青河‒富蕴地区晚新生代隆升‒剥露过程: 来自磷灰石裂变径迹的证据. 地质通报, 2015, 34(5): 834-845
[46]	Zhang J, Wang Y N, Zhang B H, et al.Evolution of the NE Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, constrained by the apatite fission track ages of the mountain ranges around the Xining Basin in NW China. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2015, 97: 10-23
[47]	Fleischer R L, Price P B, Walker R M.Nuclea. tracks in solids: principles and techniques. Berkeley, Univer-sity of California Press, 1975
[48]	Hurford A J, Green P F. The zeta age calibration of fission-track dating. Chemical Geology, 1983, 41: 285‒317
[49]	Hurford A J.Standardization of fission-track dating calibration: recommendation by the Fission Track Working Group of the IUGS Subcommission on Geochronology. Chemical Geology, 1990, 80(2): 171-178
[50]	Green P F, Duddy I R, Laslett G M, et al.Thermal annealing of fission tracks in apatite. 4. Quantitative modelling techniques and extension to geological timescales. Chemical Geology: Isotope Geoscience Section, 1989, 79(2): 155-182
[51]	张志诚, 王雪松. 裂变径迹定年资料应用中的问题及其地质意义. 北京大学学报: 自然科学版, 2004, 40(6): 898-905
[52]	Ketcham R A, Donelick R A, Carlson W D.Variability of apatite fission-track annealing kinetics: Ⅲ, Extrapolation to geological time scales. American Mineralogist, 1999, 84(9): 1235-1255
[53]	Ketcham R A, Donelick R A, Donelick M B.AFTSolve: a program for multi-kinetic modeling of apatite fission-track data. Geological Materials Re-search, 2000, 2(1): 1-32
[54]	Wu Z H, Cui S Q.Thermal tectonic evolution and uplift history of Badaling Mountain. Journal of Geo-mechanics, 1996, 2: 75-78
[55]	吴珍汉, 崔盛芹, 朱大岗, 等. 燕山南缘盘山岩体的热历史与构造‒地貌演化过程. 地质力学学报, 1999, 5(3): 28-32
[56]	吴珍汉, 崔盛芹, 吴淦国, 等. 燕山山脉隆升过程的热年代学分析. 地质论评, 2000, 46(1): 49-56
[57]	吴珍汉, 吴中海, 江万, 等. 中国大陆及邻区新生代构造‒地貌演化过程与机理. 北京: 地质出版社, 2001
[58]	程绍平, 邓起东, 杨桂枝, 等. 内蒙古大青山的新生代剥蚀和隆起. 地震地质, 2000, 22(1): 27-36
[59]	马寅生, 崔盛芹, 吴淦国, 等. 辽西医巫闾山的隆升历史. 地球学报, 2000, 21(3): 245-253
[60]	吴中海, 吴珍汉. 燕山及邻区晚白垩世以来山脉隆升历史的低温热年代学证据. 地质学报, 2003, 77(3): 399-406
[61]	李越, 季建清, 涂继耀, 等. 燕山东部柳江地区构造属性新解与郯庐断裂系活动. 岩石学报, 2009, 25(3): 675-681
[62]	李萍萍. 太行山北段晚中生代—新生代隆升的热年代学研究[D]. 北京: 北京大学, 2014
[63]	刘建辉, 张培震, 郑德文, 等. 贺兰山晚新生代隆升的剥露特征及其隆升模式. 中国科学: D 辑, 2010, 40(1): 50-60

样品号		岩性		采样位置			高程/m	N_c	N_s	ρ_s/10⁵cm²			N_i		ρ_i/10⁵cm²
DQS-1		片麻岩		40°56′30″N, 111°31′23″E			1511	32	710	4.685			2356		15.545
DQS-2		花岗岩		41°05′07″N, 111°48′02″E			1796	32	451	3.838			1398		11.898
DQS-3		片岩		41°02′46″N, 111°48′19″E			1638	30	438	5.267			1522		18.302
DQS-4		片岩		41°02′46″N, 111°48′19″E			1638	12	191	3.727			574		11.200
样品号	N_d		ρ_d/10⁵cm²		Pχ²/%	中值年龄/Ma (±1σ)		池年龄/Ma (±1σ)			L/μm (±1σ)	N_j		标准偏差/μm
DQS-1	8875		9.7534		88.60	55.0±3.1		55.0±3.1			10.7±0.4	106		2.1
DQS-2	4798		9.5498		99.84	57.7±3.8		57.7±3.8			9.9±0.3	82		1.1
DQS-3	8875		9.3462		98.86	50.4±3.3		50.4±3.3			10.3±0.1	59		1.3
DQS-4	8875		8.9389		59.50	56.7±5.6		55.7±5.1			-

样品号		岩性		采样位置			高程/m	N_c	N_s	ρ_s/10⁵cm²			N_i		ρ_i/10⁵cm²
DQS-1		片麻岩		40°56′30″N, 111°31′23″E			1511	32	710	4.685			2356		15.545
DQS-2		花岗岩		41°05′07″N, 111°48′02″E			1796	32	451	3.838			1398		11.898
DQS-3		片岩		41°02′46″N, 111°48′19″E			1638	30	438	5.267			1522		18.302
DQS-4		片岩		41°02′46″N, 111°48′19″E			1638	12	191	3.727			574		11.200
样品号	N_d		ρ_d/10⁵cm²		Pχ²/%	中值年龄/Ma (±1σ)		池年龄/Ma (±1σ)			L/μm (±1σ)	N_j		标准偏差/μm
DQS-1	8875		9.7534		88.60	55.0±3.1		55.0±3.1			10.7±0.4	106		2.1
DQS-2	4798		9.5498		99.84	57.7±3.8		57.7±3.8			9.9±0.3	82		1.1
DQS-3	8875		9.3462		98.86	50.4±3.3		50.4±3.3			10.3±0.1	59		1.3
DQS-4	8875		8.9389		59.50	56.7±5.6		55.7±5.1			-