知识型员工的完美主义与拖延:尽责性人格的调节作用

doi:10.13209/j.0479-8023.2017.046

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

通过对247名知识型员工的有效问卷调查, 探讨自我导向完美主义与拖延的关系, 发现自我导向完美主义与个体的拖延得分显著负相关。进一步的数据分析揭示, 大五人格中的尽责性在自我导向完美主义与拖延的关系中起着调节作用: 对尽责性低的人而言, 自我导向完美主义显著降低了拖延, 而对高尽责性的人而言, 自我取向的完美主义对拖延没有影响。研究结果为理解拖延这一日常现象及其影响拖延的因素以及这些因素之间的关系提供了新的视角。

关键词: 拖延, 自我导向完美主义, 大五人格, 尽责性

Abstract:

Based on the survey of 250 staffs, this study explored the relationship between self-oriented perfect-ionism and procrastination. It is found that self-oriented perfectionism negatively correlates with procrastination and conscientiousness of Big-five plays a moderating role: For people low in conscientiousness, self-oriented perfectionism would significantly decrease the procrastination, while for people high in conscientiousness, self-oriented perfectionism has no effect on procrastination. The results are of great reference value for further under-standing of procrastination, and its influence factors.

Key words: procrastination, self-oriented perfectionism, big five personality, conscientiousness

侯玉波, 顾水云. 知识型员工的完美主义与拖延:尽责性人格的调节作用[J]. 北京大学学报自然科学版, 2017, 53(3): 573-578.

Yubo HOU, Shuiyun GU. Perfectionism and Procrastination: The Moderating Role of Conscientiousness[J]. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 2017, 53(3): 573-578.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://xbna.pku.edu.cn/CN/10.13209/j.0479-8023.2017.046

https://xbna.pku.edu.cn/CN/Y2017/V53/I3/573

图/表 4

参考文献 25

[1]	Solomon L J, Rothblum E D.Academic procras-tination: frequency and cognitive-behavioral correlates. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1984, 31(4): 503-509
[2]	Beswick G, Rothblum E, Mann L.Psychological antecedents to student procrastination. Australian Psychologist, 1988, 23: 207-217
[3]	Klingsieck K B.Procrastination: when good things don’t come to those who wait. European Psychologist, 2013, 18(18): 24-34
[4]	Tuckman B W.The development and concurrent validity of the procrastination scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1991, 51(2): 473-480
[5]	Briody R.An exploratory study of procrastination. Dissertation Abstracts International, 1980, 41: 590
[6]	Beutel M E, Klein E M, Aufenanger S, et al.Procrastination, distress and life satisfaction across the age range — a German representative community study. Plos One, 2016, 11(2): e0148054
[7]	Horney K.Neurosis and human growth: the struggle toward self-realization. Oxford: W W Norton & Company, 1950: 124
[8]	Hewitt P L, Flett G L.Perfectionism in the self and social contexts: conceptualization, assessment, and association with psychopathology. Journal of Persona-lity and Social Psychology, 1991, 60(3): 456-470
[9]	Klibert J J, Langhinrichsen-Rohling J, Saito M.Adaptive and maladaptive aspects of self-oriented versus socially prescribed perfectionism. Journal of College Student Development, 2010, 46(2): 141-156
[10]	Steel P.The nature of procrastination: a meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regu-latory failure. Psychological Bulletin, 2007, 133(1): 65-94
[11]	John O P, Srivastava S.The Big Five Trait taxonomy: history, measurement, and theoretical perspectives // Pervin L A, John O P. Handbook of personality: theory and research. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press, 1999: 102-138
[12]	Roberts B W, Chernyshenko O S, Stark S, et al.The structure of conscientiousness: an empirical investig-ation based on seven major personality question-naires. Personnel Psychology, 2005, 58(1): 103-139
[13]	Paunonen S V, Jackson D N.The Jackson Personality Inventory and the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 1996, 30(1): 42-59
[14]	Watson D C.Procrastination and the five-factor model: a facet level analysis. Personality and Indi-vidual Differences, 2001, 30(1): 149-158
[15]	陈俊, 易晓文. 拖延行为个体对人格特征词、拖延词的注意偏向. 心理科学, 2009, 32(2): 316-319
[16]	Johnson J L, Bloom A M.An analysis of the contribution of the five factors of personality to variance in academic procrastination. Personality and Individual Differences, 1995, 18(1): 127-133
[17]	McCrae R R, Löckenhoff C E. Self-regulation and the five-factor model of personality traits // Handbook of personality and self-regulation. Wiley-Blackwell, 2010: 145-168
[18]	周奇志, 宋广文, 李建伟. Hewitt 多维完美主义量表在 1959 名大学生中的试用与修订. 黑龙江教育学院学报, 2008, 27(2): 75-77
[19]	Steel P.Arousal, avoidant and decisional procrastina-tors: do they exist? Personality & Individual Differences, 2010, 48(8): 926-934
[20]	Saucier G.Mini-markers: a brief version of Gold-berg’s unipolar big-five markers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1994, 63(3): 506-516
[21]	Stoeber J, Feast A R, Hayward J A.Self-oriented and socially prescribed perfectionism: differential relation- ships with intrinsic and extrinsic motivation and test anxiety. Personality and Individual Differences, 2009, 47(5): 423-428
[22]	Balkis M, Duru E.The evaluation of the major characteristics and aspects of the procrastination in the framework of psychological counseling and guidance. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 2007, 7(1): 376-385
[23]	Sirois F M, Melia-Gordon M L, Pychyl T A. “I’ll look after my health, later”: an investigation of procra-stination and health. Personality and Individual Differences, 2003, 35(5): 1167-1184
[24]	Klingsieck K B, Fries S, Horz C, et al.Procrastination in a distance university setting. Distance Education, 2012, 33(3): 295-310
[25]	杨国枢, 陆洛. 社会取向自我实现者与个人取向自我实现者心理特征: 概念分析与实证衡量. 本土心理学研究, 2005, 23: 71-143

变量	M	SD	年龄	性别	拖延	完美主义
年龄	26.245	3.390
性别			0.069
拖延	27.505	7.746	0.089	0.040
自我导向	66.075	12.140	0.150**	-0.041	-0.145*
尽责性	28.350	4.586	0.139*	-0.025	-0.476**	0.193*

变量	M	SD	年龄	性别	拖延	完美主义
年龄	26.245	3.390
性别			0.069
拖延	27.505	7.746	0.089	0.040
自我导向	66.075	12.140	0.150**	-0.041	-0.145*
尽责性	28.350	4.586	0.139*	-0.025	-0.476**	0.193*

步骤	预测变量	β
第1步	控制变量
	年龄	0.087
	性别	0.033
	校正R²	0.000
	ΔR²	0.009
第2步	主效应
	年龄	0.111
	性别	0.027
	自我导向完美主义	-0.156*
	校正R²	0.019
	ΔR²	0.024

步骤	预测变量	β
第1步	控制变量
	年龄	0.087
	性别	0.033
	校正R²	0.000
	ΔR²	0.009
第2步	主效应
	年龄	0.111
	性别	0.027
	自我导向完美主义	-0.156*
	校正R²	0.019
	ΔR²	0.024

步骤	预测变量	标准化回归系数	t	显著性水平
第1步	年龄	0.08	1.18	0.24
	性别	0.04	0.62	0.54
	R²			0.01
第2步	主效应
	年龄	0.10	1.44	0.15
	性别	0.04	0.58	0.56
	自我导向完美主义	-0.13	-1.89	0.06
	R²			0.01
第3步	年龄	0.16	2.63	0.01
	性别	0.02	0.41	0.68
	自我导向完美主义	-0.07	-1.07	0.29
	尽责性	-0.49	-8.02	0.00
	R²			0.25
第4步	交互作用
	年龄	0.15	2.40	0.02
	性别	0.04	0.69	0.49
	自我导向完美主义	-0.07	-1.17	0.24
	尽责性	-0.47	--.72	0.00
	自我导向完美主义×尽责性	0.16	2.58	0.01
	R²			0.28
	ΔR²			0.02