激情犯罪他评检查表的编制与信效度

doi:10.13209/j.0479-8023.2023.083

北京大学学报自然科学版 ›› 2023, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (6): 1035-1042.DOI: 10.13209/j.0479-8023.2023.083

激情犯罪他评检查表的编制与信效度

王中瑞¹, 黄鑫², 周颖², 钟杰^2,†

1. 西华大学心理健康教育中心, 成都 610039 2. 行为与心理健康北京市重点实验室, 北京大学心理与认知科学学院, 北京 100871

收稿日期:2022-11-06 修回日期:2023-03-04 出版日期:2023-11-20 发布日期:2023-11-20
通讯作者: 钟杰, E-mail: jzhong(at)pku.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(91224002)资助

An Other-report Checklist for Crime Due to Passionate Impulse: Construction and Psychometric Properties

WANG Zhongrui¹, HUANG Xin², ZHOU Ying², ZHONG Jie^2,†

1. Mental Health Education Center, Xihua University, Chengdu 610039 2. Beijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health, School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871

Received:2022-11-06 Revised:2023-03-04 Online:2023-11-20 Published:2023-11-20
Contact: ZHONG Jie, E-mail: jzhong(at)pku.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

梳理激情犯罪的操作性定义和评估要素, 编制适用于服刑人员的《激情犯罪他评检查表》, 并检验其信效度。样本1招募40名狱警, 评定15份典型暴力卷宗, 探索该检测表的评定准确率、因子结构以及内部一致性。样本2招募14名狱警, 评定275份罪犯卷宗, 将 UPPS冲动性量表等作为校标, 测量对应的服刑人员, 检验该检测表的关联效度、评定阈值、重测和评定者信度。结果表明, 激情犯罪组得分高于对照组; 探索性因素分析结果支持单因素模型, 该量表的内部一致性信度、评定者信度和重测信度均达到心理测量学要求, 同时体现出较好的汇聚和区分效度; 该检查表具有较强的检测效力, 经过接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析, 确定其阈值为10.5, 可作为筛查激情犯罪服刑人员的有效工具。

关键词: 激情犯罪, 检查表, 他评, 信度, 效度

Abstract:

After clarifying the operational definition and assessment criteria of crimes of passion, an assessment checklist for incarcerated individuals, “Crimes Due to Passionate Impulse Other-report Checklist”, was developed and its reliability and validity were tested. Sample 1 involved 40 prison guards assessing 15 typical violent dossiers, exploring the checklist’s accuracy, factor structure, and internal consistency. Sample 2 comprised 14 prison guards evaluating 275 offender dossiers, using the UPPS Impulsivity Scale as a benchmark to measure corresponding inmates, examining the checklist’s convergent validity, threshold determination, test-retest reliability, and evaluator reliability. Results indicated that scores for the crimes of passion group were higher than the control group. Exploratory factor analysis supported a single-factor model. The scale demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency, evaluator reliability, and test-retest reliability, meeting psychometric standards. It also showed good convergent and discriminant validity. With robust assessment capabilities, the checklist’s threshold was determined to be 10.5 via ROC (receiver operating characterisitic) curve analysis, positioning it an effective tool for screening inmates committing crimes of passion.

Key words: crime due to passionate impulse, checklist, other-report, reliability, validity

王中瑞, 黄鑫, 周颖, 钟杰. 激情犯罪他评检查表的编制与信效度[J]. 北京大学学报自然科学版, 2023, 59(6): 1035-1042.

WANG Zhongrui, HUANG Xin, ZHOU Ying, ZHONG Jie. An Other-report Checklist for Crime Due to Passionate Impulse: Construction and Psychometric Properties[J]. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 2023, 59(6): 1035-1042.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://xbna.pku.edu.cn/CN/10.13209/j.0479-8023.2023.083

https://xbna.pku.edu.cn/CN/Y2023/V59/I6/1035

[1]	苗淼, 周志伟, 钟绍婷, 何庆欢, 奇巍. 三维度生命意义感量表的中文版翻译及其信效度检验[J]. 北京大学学报自然科学版, 2024, 60(1): 188-194.
[2]	张又文, 李佳璐, 钟杰. 回避型人格组织量表的编制[J]. 北京大学学报自然科学版, 2022, 58(5): 959-966.
[3]	陈亚东, 洪宇, 王潇斌, 杨雪蓉, 姚建民, 朱巧明. 融合多模型与高置信度词典的事件线索检测[J]. 北京大学学报自然科学版, 2017, 53(3): 412-420.
[4]	徐杰. 一种基于立方格的散乱点云曲面网格化方法[J]. 北京大学学报（自然科学版）, 2014, 50(2): 228-234.
[5]	黄韫慧,吕爱芹,王垒,施俊琦. 大学生情绪智力量表的效度检验[J]. 北京大学学报（自然科学版）, 2008, 44(6): 970-976.
[6]	陈阳, 黄韫慧, 王垒, 施俊琦 . 结构需求量表的信效度检验[J]. 北京大学学报（自然科学版）, 2008, 44(3): 490-492.
[7]	蒋伟,项海格. 采用M-QAM调制的MIMO系统中基于置信度传播的多用户检测算法[J]. 北京大学学报（自然科学版）, 2004, 40(5): 814-822.

激情犯罪他评检查表的编制与信效度

An Other-report Checklist for Crime Due to Passionate Impulse: Construction and Psychometric Properties

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 7

编辑推荐

Metrics

留言