城市邻里环境在儿童户外体力活动方面的可供性研究 —— 以北京市燕东园社区为例

doi:10.13209/j.0479-8023.2015.023

北京大学学报（自然科学版）

• 北京大学学报 •

城市邻里环境在儿童户外体力活动方面的可供性研究 —— 以北京市燕东园社区为例

曲琛^1,2;韩西丽^1,2

1. 北京大学深圳研究生院城市规划与设计学院, 深圳518055;
2. 北京大学建筑与景观设计学院, 北京 100871;

收稿日期:2014-12-11 修回日期:2014-04-15 出版日期:2015-05-20 发布日期:2015-05-20
通讯作者: 曲琛 evergreenqz@californiacolleges.net; 韩西丽 hanxl@pkusz.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(41001089)资助

Affordances of Urban Neighborhood Environment for Children’s Outdoor Physical Activities: A Case Study in Yandongyuan, Beijing

QU Chen^1,2;HAN Xili^1,2

1. School of Urban Planning and Design, Shenzhen Graduate School, Peking University, Shenzhen 518055;
2. College of Architecture and Landscape Architecture, Peking University, Beijing 100871;

Received:2014-12-11 Revised:2014-04-15 Online:2015-05-20 Published:2015-05-20
Contact: QU Chen evergreenqz@californiacolleges.net; HAN Xili hanxl@pkusz.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 使用感知地图绘制与访谈结合的方法, 以94 名6~12 岁的儿童为研究对象, 对北京市燕东园社区邻里环境在儿童户外体力活动方面的可供性现状和儿童理想的邻里环境可供性进行调查, 获得188 份有效感知地图。研究发现: 1) 邻里环境在儿童户外体力活动方面的可供性结构呈现被使用的可供性>被感知的可供性>被塑造的可供性的特征, 比例为15:12:1; 2) 对邻里环境可供性总量贡献最大的元素是“地面”和“植物”; 3) 儿童理想的邻里户外活动环境中被感知的可供性提高幅度最大的环境元素是“建构筑物及园林小品”、“天气及微气候”及“水体”, 被使用的可供性显著提高的环境元素为“运动与游乐设施”和“环保与服务设施”; 4) “科幻”及 “多媒体设施”作为理想的邻里环境元素被提出, 但其可供性仅限于被感知和被使用, 且数量有限。

关键词: 城市邻里, 儿童, 户外体力活动, 环境可供性

Abstract: Cognitive maps drawing and interview are used as main methods and 94 children aged 6–12 are investigated to reveal the affordances of the present and children’s ideal urban neighborhood environment in Yandongyuan, Beijing for children’s outdoor physical activities. Based on 188 valid cognitive maps, the results are analyzed and compared with international related researches. It shows that, 1) the structure of present environment affordances in Yandongyuan neighborhood is that used affordance>perceived affordance>shaped affordance, the specific proportion is 15:12:1; 2) the largest contribution of environmental elements to the total neighborhood environment affordances is “ground” and “plants”, they provide a relatively most used affordance; 3) in children’s ideal neighborhood outdoor activity environment, “building structures/garden sketches”, “weather/microclimate” and “water” are improved most in perceived affordance; the environmental elements significantly improved in used affordance are “sports/recreation facilities” and “environmental protection/service facilities”; 4) “science fiction facilities” and “multimedia facilities” have been proposed as children’s ideal neighborhood environmental elements, but their affordances are limited to perceived and used aspects , and the number of affordance is limited as well.

Key words: urban neighborhood, children, outdoor physical activities, environment affordances

曲琛;韩西丽. 城市邻里环境在儿童户外体力活动方面的可供性研究 —— 以北京市燕东园社区为例[J]. 北京大学学报（自然科学版）, DOI: 10.13209/j.0479-8023.2015.023.

QU Chen;HAN Xili. Affordances of Urban Neighborhood Environment for Children’s Outdoor Physical Activities: A Case Study in Yandongyuan, Beijing[J]. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, DOI: 10.13209/j.0479-8023.2015.023.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://xbna.pku.edu.cn/CN/10.13209/j.0479-8023.2015.023

https://xbna.pku.edu.cn/CN/Y2015/V51/I3/531

参考文献

[1] Kohl H W, Hobbs K E. Development of physical activity behaviors among children and adolescents. Pediatrics, 1998, 101(Suppl 2): 549–554
[2] United States Department of Health and Human Services. Physical activity guidelines for Americans. Washington DC: US HHS, 2008: 7–12, 15
[3] Pařízková J. Nutrition, physical activity, and health in early life. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2010
[4] World Health Organization. Diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases. Report of a joint WHO/FAO Expert consultation. Geneva: WHO, 2003: 1–3 北京大学学报(自然科学版) 第51 卷第3 期 2015 年5 月 538
[5] 中国学生体质与健康研究组. 2000 年中国学生体质与健康调查报告. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2002
[6] McCurdy L E, Winterbottom K E, Mehta S S, et al. Using nature and outdoor activity to improve children’s health. Current Problems in Pediatric and Adolescent Health Care, 2010, 40(5): 102–107
[7] 杨则宜. 我国青少年学生体质的现状、问题与对策. 中国运动医学杂志, 2008, 27(3): 397–400
[8] 王国勇, 程杰. 中葡都市青少年体力活动、健康体能的比较研究: 以上海市和布拉加两城市为例. 北京体育大学学报, 2009, 32(10): 60–63
[9] 刘军廷, 米杰. 1985 年来北京市中小学生健康水平变化趋势. 中国循证儿科杂志, 2011, 6(2): 140–145
[10] 上海市学生体质健康监测中心. 2010 年上海学生体质与健康调研报告. 上海教育, 2011(14): 16
[11] 王小波. 儿童休闲: 被遗忘的角落——我国城市儿童休闲状况调查. 青年研究, 2004(10): 35–41
[12] 刘冰颖. 城市儿童游戏和游戏活动空间的设计研究 [D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2005
[13] Veitch J, Bagley S, Ball K, et al. Where do children usually play? A qualitative study of parents’ perceptions of influences on children’s active free-play. Health & place, 2006, 12(4): 383–393
[14] 王渝柯. 当代公共空间中看与被看的关系研究: 住区邻里空间探析. 华中建筑, 2008, 26(7): 67–72
[15] Hume C, Salmon J, Ball K. Children’s perceptions of their home and neighborhood environments, and their association with objectively measured physical activity: a qualitative and quantitative study. Health Education Research, 2005, 20(1): 1–13
[16] Ding D, Sallis J F, Kerr J, et al. Neighborhood environment and physical activity among youth: a review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2011, 41(4): 442–455
[17] Villanueva K, Giles-Corti B, Bulsara M, et al. How far do children travel from their homes? Exploring children’s activity spaces in their neighborhood. Health & Place, 2012, 18(2): 263–273
[18] 韩西丽, Sternudd C, 赵文强. 城市儿童户外体力活动研究进展. 人文地理, 2011, 26(6): 29–33
[19] Gibson J J. The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1979: 128–130
[20] Heft H. Affordances of children’s environments: a functional approach to environmental description. Children’s Environments Quarterly, 1988, 5(3): 29–37
[21] Yatiman N A, Aziz N F, Said I. Affordances of homeschool journey in rural environment for children’s performances. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2012, 68: 395–405
[22] Kyttä M. Children in outdoor contexts: affordances and independent mobility in the assessment of environmental child friendliness [D]. Helsinki: Helsinki University of Technology, 2003: 56–57, 93–94
[23] Said I. Methods for evaluating responses of children with outdoor environments. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2012, 49: 39–46
[24] Kyttä M. Affordances of children’s environments in the context of cities, small towns, suburbs and rural villages in Finland and Belarus. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2002, 22(1): 109–123
[25] Kyttä M. The extent of children’s independent mobility and the number of actualized affordances as criteria for child-friendly environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2004, 24(2): 179–198
[26] De Coninck-Smith N. Barndom og arkitektur. Aarhus: Klim, 2011
[27] Petersen L S. Interaktive legemiljøer - et nyt fænomen og med hvilket potentiale? Fokus Idræt, 2010(4): 22– 25

城市邻里环境在儿童户外体力活动方面的可供性研究 —— 以北京市燕东园社区为例

Affordances of Urban Neighborhood Environment for Children’s Outdoor Physical Activities: A Case Study in Yandongyuan, Beijing

PDF

PDF (翻译版)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 2

编辑推荐

Metrics

留言

[1]	金颖, 傅义程. 在职培训对小学教师指导注意缺陷多动障碍儿童能力的影响——北京市教师培训的实证研究[J]. 北京大学学报自然科学版, 2022, 58(5): 967-973.
[2]	王冬,韩西丽. 北京城中村儿童户外体力活动环境影响因子分析---以大有庄、骚子营邻里为例[J]. 北京大学学报（自然科学版）, 2012, 48(5): 841-847.