北京大学学报自然科学版 ›› 2022, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (5): 909-915.DOI: 10.13209/j.0479-8023.2022.049

上一篇    下一篇

基于水生态系统服务的水景观综合绩效评价框架

刘佳驹1,2,3, 王志勇2, 王春连2, 吴珊珊2, 王宇泓4, 阳平坚3,†   

  1. 1. 北京大学建筑与景观设计学院, 北京 100871 2. 北京大学景观设计学研究院, 北京 100871 3. 中国环境科学研究院环境管理研究中心, 北京 100012 4. Bartlett School of Architecture and Built Environment, University College London, London WC1E 6BT
  • 收稿日期:2021-10-12 修回日期:2022-04-28 出版日期:2022-09-20 发布日期:2022-09-20
  • 通讯作者: 阳平坚, E-mail: yang.pingjian(at)craes.org.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(51678002)资助 

Comprehensive Performance Evaluation Framework of Water Landscape with the Orientation of Water Eco-system Service

LIU Jiaju1,2,3, WANG Zhiyong2, WANG Chunlian2, WU Shanshan2, WANG Yuhong4, YANG Pingjian3,†   

  1. 1. School of Architecture and Landscape Design, Peking University, Beijing 100871 2. Institute of Landscape Architecture, Peking University, Beijing 100871 3. Research Center for Environmental Management, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012 4. Bartlett School of Architecture and Built Environment, University College London, London WC1E 6BT
  • Received:2021-10-12 Revised:2022-04-28 Online:2022-09-20 Published:2022-09-20
  • Contact: YANG Pingjian, E-mail: yang.pingjian(at)craes.org.cn

摘要:

为解决现有研究中评价体系缺乏生态学理论支撑, 缺乏针对场地设计尺度的水景观综合绩效评估, 在框架或指标的选取上完整性、典型性和可获得性不足等问题, 充分梳理景观绩效评价的4种体系, 探讨水生态系统服务的相关理论, 识别水生态系统服务类别及要素, 阐明水生态系统服务与景观绩效评价的逻辑关系。以水生态系统服务理论为理论依据, 结合国际景观绩效相关评价体系及指标, 构建一套兼具科学性与可操作性的水景观综合绩效评价指标体系, 共包含5类项目层、10类准则层和28个指标项。研究结果可为水景观设计师优化设计策略提供科学依据。

关键词: 水生态系统服务, 综合绩效, 设计生态学, 评价体系

Abstract:

The existing landscape performance evaluation research has problems such as the lack of ecological theory support in the evaluation system, the lack of comprehensive performance evaluation of water landscape according to the scale of site design, the completeness of the selection of framework or indicators, and the lack of typicality and availability. Therefore, the authors fully combed the four existing systems of landscape performance evaluation. At the same time, the related theories of water ecosystem services were studied, the types and elements of water ecosystem services were identified, and then the logical relationship between water ecosystem services and landscape performance evaluation were clarified. Based on the water ecosystem service theory, combined with the relevant international landscape performance evaluation system and indicators, the authors built a scientific and operable comprehensive performance evaluation index system for water landscapes, including 5 types of project layers, 10 types of criteria layers and 28 indicators. The relevant results are expected to provide a basis for the 
optimization of design strategies for water landscape designers. 

Key words: water ecosystem services, comprehensive performance, design ecology, evaluation system