Abstract: The connotation of rural green landscape was discussed. The purposes of integrated evaluation are to appropriately assess ecological, economic, aesthetic and cultural values of rural green landscape during rapid urbanization. Based on this, the model of integrative evaluation was constructed by Delphi and analytic hierarchy process, and applied to two urban-type villages, two suburban villages and two remote suburban villages in Wujin district, Changzhou City. The following results are obtained. The comprehensive assessment indexes of the three villages are“better”and the others are “ordinary”. Ecological and aesthetic values are the main factors in this evaluation. Remote suburban villages and suburban villages have the maximum and minimum comprehensive valuation value respectively. The mean value of ecological, economic and aesthetic values of green landscape in these three type villages is: remote suburban villages > urban-type villages > suburban villages. The mean value of cultural value is: urban-type villages >remote suburban villages > suburban villages. The four values of each village were evaluated and the main differences were aesthetic and cultural values. Furthermore, the reasons of evaluation results were analyzed and the advice for future rural greening was given.

Key words: rural green landscape, comprehensive evaluation, index system, new countryside

摘要： 探讨了新农村绿化景观的内涵, 提出在快速城市化背景下应对其生态价值、经济价值、美学价值和地方文化价值进行综合评价。利用层次分析法和 Delphi 法建立了综合评价模型, 并选取常州市武进区城镇型村庄、城郊型村庄和乡村型村庄各2个进行研究。结果表明: 6 个村庄绿化景观的综合评价值中3 个村庄属于“良好”, 3个村庄属于 “一般”, 影响综合评价值的主要因子是生态价值和美学价值; 3 种类型村庄绿化景观的综合评价值均值大小是乡村型村庄 > 城镇型村庄 > 城郊型村庄, 其中经济价值、生态价值和美学价值的均值大小是乡村型村庄 > 城镇型村庄 > 城郊型村庄, 地方文化价值是城镇型村庄 > 乡村型村庄 > 城郊型村庄;单个村庄绿化的美学价值和地方文化价值波动较大。此外, 分析了各类型村庄绿化景观评价值高低的原因, 总结绿化工作得失, 对未来新农村绿化建设提出建议。

关键词: 农村绿化景观, 综合评价, 指标体系, 新农村